THE big trouble with chequebook journalism is that many audiences still believe TV news stories without questioning their validity.
There’s no question that, for more critical audiences, programs such as ‘Today Tonight’ and ‘A Current Affair’ can deliver an enjoyable, almost cathartic experience.
In fact, there aren’t many of us who haven’t shared a giggle at others’ misfortunes or personal flaws.
But where such light-hearted journalism crosses the line is when it leads to great personal distress.
This could well be the case after ‘A Current Affair’ last week aired a segment featuring the Croydon Cinemas.
The segment centred around a verbal outburst from a staff member, who refused entry for an elderly couple.
This incident was captured on a mobile phone and obtained by ‘A Current Affair’.
While not commenting on this particular incident or segment, it’s important for viewers to consider the role of the citizen journalist and their present relationship with TV news producers.
Thanks to mobile phones, nearly every citizen today is their own personal news crew, which evidently is becoming a great thing if you’re into chequebook journalism.
This higher availability of controversial footage is making it more tempting for producers to skew the story in whichever direction they please, without delving into the story at all.
Also, for viewers of today’s media, it’s important to consider that those who supply such footage may have financial motivations.
Potential recent examples of news-profiteering include an incident with AFL star Chris Judd, who was targeted while enjoying a bite of lunch; or Hawthorn coach, Alistair Clarkson, who was filmed in a physical confrontation with an opposition fan.
More and more our private lives are becoming public, which is great for TV producers.
Please consider this possibility when enjoying your favourite current affairs show.